Interior options, analyzed and visualized
Works safely with drawings and specs, matches materials, finishes and furniture from the company database, and compares interior options with visuals and cost estimates.
Design change reviews: 12 days → a few days
- Customer
- Korean contractor
- Areas
- Materials, Visualization
- Deployment
- On-premises
1Problem
Every interior option change meant looking up drawings, specs and materials separately, then rebuilding visuals and costs. A design change review took 12 days on average.
2Input
Drawings, construction specifications, and the company's materials, finishes and furniture database
3How it works
A natural-language interface takes requests like "make this space modern," matches materials, finishes and furniture from the company database, and produces visuals with a combined cost estimate.
4Output
Interior visuals per option, with a combined cost estimate
Results
- Delivered on-premises to a Korean contractor
- Custom models trained on the client's own data
- Design change reviews: 12 days on average → a few days
Could this work on your projects?
Tell us about your challenges, and we'll explain how a similar approach could apply.
More case studies
On-premises rendering for industrial plants
Scattered design data, restructured so AI can use it. Fine-tuned models and section-level prompts run as a lightweight deployment on the client's own infrastructure.
Phase 1 live, now in support and maintenance
Landscape options from site plans
Select an area on an early landscape plan and describe what you want. A model trained on Korean residential landscapes generates the options.
4 landscape options per area, in one pass
RFI answers for structural review
RFIs, structural drawings, and site photos, structured into one knowledge base. It finds similar past cases and drafts answers that cite the governing code clauses.
Draft RFI answers from similar past cases